|
don’t miss the
boat on new customs rules
THERE’S ALWAYS
SOMETHING TO KEEP IMPORTERS AWAKE AT NIGHT. Just as the threat
of further labor disruptions at U.S. ports began to evaporate, new
government rules took effect that could disrupt the distribution
networks of businesses that import goods into the United States.
If you import
goods into your distribution system, you already know that U.S.
Customs demands detailed information on what’s being carried on
ships headed for the United States 24 hours before the goods are
loaded. The regulation containing the 24-hour requirement, known
as the Cargo Security Initiative (CSI), took effect at the beginning
of December. Customs gave ocean carriers two months to implement
the new rules fully, a period that expires early next month. If
Customs doesn’t receive the information, containers may quite literally
miss the boat to the United States, leaving the freight inside stranded
on the dock.
The new rules
represent a major departure from past practice. Previously, shippers
could submit documentation to the carrier after the vessel had departed.
Carriers could file a vessel manifest with U.S. Customs up to two
weeks following a ship’s departure from the foreign port. “The new
regulation now requires this information in advance,” says John
Urban, president of GT Nexus,a logistics software company that specializes
in international shipping. “It essentially collapses that two-week
window while requiring more detailed and precise descriptions of
cargoes.”
Many observers
expect that the rules’ implementation will raise shipping costs
and create delays in the movement of goods, at least in the near
term. The volume of freight affected by the rules is enormous. Nearly
half of the goods involved in U.S. inbound trade (when measured
by value) arrive by ocean carrier, and about six million containers
arrive in the United States each year.
High anxiety
The CSI, which was drafted to address concerns regarding freight
security following the Sept.11, 2001, terrorist attacks, attempts
to strike a balance between tightening security requirements and
minimizing delays. If the regulation achieves its four main objectives,
the Customs Service will be able to routinely use automated information
to identify and target high-risk containers; pre-screen those containers
identified as high risk before they a rrive at U.S. ports; use detection
technology to pre-screen high-risk containers quickly; and push
for the use of smarter, tamper-proof containers.
To keep the
customs clearance process from getting bogged down, the CSI mandates
that all information be sent electronically. Specifically, it requires
shippers and carriers to file full line-item detail in shipping
manifests with U.S. Customs’ Automated Manifest System 24 hours
before goods bound for the United States can be loaded aboard ships
in a foreign port. The rules affect all shipments headed for the
United States, including those that will transship to other nations
through the United States as well as freight bound for other nations
on ships making U.S. port calls en route.
Because ocean
lines depend on the bill of lading instructions for this information,
the new regulation will require importers or their export agents
overseas to provide accurate and complete shipment documentation
to the ocean lines much earlier than before. And the information
required is not limited to a precise description of the cargo. According
to GT Nexus, Customs now requires detailed information on the shipper
and consignee as well.
The potential
penalties are high for any shipper that fails to meet those information
demands. Aberdeen Group, a business technology research and advisory
firm that specializes in supply chain technology, predicts that
the new rules could cause shipments without the proper documentation
to be left on the docks at the port of departure for days or even
weeks after their scheduled departure dates. And even compliant
shippers could run into problems if they share container space with
others who don’t meet the requirements.
Many see technology
as importers’ best hope for achieving compliance quickly. “Employing
existing and proven technology will be the key in achieving compliance
with the new CSI regulations,” said Jack Maynard, research director,
collaborative business solutions for the Aberdeen Group, in prepared
comments. To achieve timely compliance,he says, companies must have
access to the manifest data at the lineitem detail level—including
harmonized codes—as well as the ability to move the information
electronically to U.S. Customs. “Importers and carriers,” he says,
“need to act immediately and will be well served by deploying systems
that capture the relevant information and streamline these processes
today.”
Rough sailing
Customs’ initial goal was to have the top 20 foreign ports, based
on cargo volume shipped to the United States, participating in the
program. As of late last year, 11 of those ports had agreed to participate.
But the implementation
has not been without its probl ems. Late in December, for example,
the European Commission charged that the ports that had agreed to
implement the CSI were breaking European law, which prohibits bilateral
agreements between individual members and foreign states. The commission
planned to bring charges against France, Belgium, the Netherlands
and Germany, according to news reports, and it could file charges
against the United Kingdom and Italy. In response, U.S. Customs
Service commissioners said they would expand the CSI to include
the ports responsible for nearly all shipments to the United States
in order to overcome charges that the CSI agreements with select
ports created unfair trade distortions.
In the meantime,
with Customs about to start enforcing the two-month-old rules, U.S.
importers have little time to get their information systems in order.
|
cracking
the code
Confused
by the alphabet soup of acronyms used to identify the U.S.
Customs Service’s various automation initiatives? Here’s a
quick guide to help you tell the CSI from the C-TPAT:
ACE:
The Automated Commercial Environment is the overarching
initiative to modernize U.S. Customs’ information-processing
capabilities.
CSI:
The Container Security Initiative requires shippers
to electronically present detailed manifest data before
the loading of cargo destined for U.S. ports.
C-TPAT:
The Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism is a cooperative
endeavor between the trade community and the U.S. Customs
Service to develop, enhance and maintain effective security
processes throughout the global supply chain.
ITDS:
The International Trade Data System project aims to create
a single database and processing platform for trade-related
data used by 104 federal agencies.
SOURCE:
THE ABERDEEN GROUP
|
next>
newsworthy article
execs
continue to hand over the keys to the warehouse
<Back
to the Table of Contents
|